🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are observing intently to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a rising chorus of states are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our kids' childhood". The policy may be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked the legislature to pass a law lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related step, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged families to block their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a advisory statement calling for a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is granted. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a solid first step," commented one MEP supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in robust data".

Earlier, interest grew behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end watered down. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to investigate the topic.

Charities have voiced concerns. One foundation set up by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after encountering dangerous social media material argues that a strict age ban may not make platforms safer and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to build products and services that are safe and fit for minors," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

Stateside, legislation is primarily happening at the state level amid federal gridlock.

• Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law capping minors to one hour of social media time per day, with additional time requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced laws requiring guardian approval for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from some politicians to copy the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Beyond Europe and the US, other nations are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, global agencies take a more nuanced stance. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The organization notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve safety.

Even as this international discussion continues, the steps of Australia and others indicate that governments globally are no longer prepared to wait for the industry to self-regulate.